Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 8 results ...
Chang, C-Y, Chou, H-Y and Wang, M-T (2006) Characterizing the corporate governance of UK listed construction companies. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 647-56.
Duncan, K, Philips, P and Prus, M (2006) Prevailing wage legislation and public school construction efficiency: a stochastic frontier approach1. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 625-34.
Hartmann, A (2006) The context of innovation management in construction firms. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 567-78.
Hyari, K and El-Rayes, K (2006) Field experiments to evaluate lighting performance in nighttime highway construction. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 591-601.
Navon, R and Berkovich, O (2006) An automated model for materials management and control. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 635-46.
Phua, F T T (2006) When is construction partnering likely to happen? An empirical examination of the role of institutional norms. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 615-24.
Soetanto, R, Dainty, A R J, Glass, J and Price, A D F (2006) Towards an explicit design decision process: the case of the structural frame. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 603-14.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: Conflict; criteria; design; project team; structural frame
- ISBN/ISSN: 0144-6193
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446190600568173
- Abstract:
Decisions made during the briefing and conceptual design stages of a building project are critical to its success. One of the earliest major decisions which can have a significant effect on downstream events and results is the selection of the structural frame. Given its importance to the efficacy of the finished building, the structural frame selection process should arguably be objective and transparent, the final decision being based on the frame’s ability to perform against a range of criteria appropriate to the scheme in question. However, the heuristics underpinning such decisions tend not to be explicit and thus, are difficult for inexperienced clients to understand. This article reports on research which examined the criteria used by clients, structural engineers, architects and main contractors when selecting structural frames. These were established via a postal questionnaire survey of a stratified sample of design professionals, contractors and client organizations. The analysis reveals marked differences in the perceived importance of the criteria identified amongst the respondents, which may result in conflicts between design and construction advisers and their clients should they be made explicit in the design process. Nevertheless, it is important that such differences are revealed within the decision-making process if more appropriate design decisions are to be made in the future.
Song, Y, Liu, C and Langston, C (2006) Linkage measures of the construction sector using the hypothetical extraction method. Construction Management and Economics, 24(06), 579-89.